4.7 Article

Performance study of the cross-flow Maisotsenko cycle in humid climate conditions

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104581

Keywords

Maisotsenko cycle; Evaporative cooling in humid climate; Condensation

Funding

  1. Polish National Centre for Research and Development, program Lider X [U/0180/666/2019]
  2. Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (Bekker program) [PPN/BEK/2018/1/00347/U/00001]
  3. Department of Control Systems and Mechatronics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology [0401/0122/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a first numerical analysis of the cross-flow Maisotsenko cycle (M-Cycle) below dew-point evaporative cooler for humid climates with model including the water vapor condensation phenomenon. Proposed solution allows to cool ambient air below its dew-point temperature, by utilizing cooling energy in air extracted from the building, due to that it can be used as effective pre-cooling solution for traditional systems. Proposed unit has significant advantage over traditional counter and cross-flow units operating in heat recovery mode, hence it is almost insensitive on temperature of exhaust air. This is caused by effective pre-cooling of the exhaust air in its initial part. Operation in humid climates using cold extracted air results in condensation occurrence in the primary air channels, and hence partial dehumidification of the primary airflow (which allows to cool the air before its dew- point temperature). The Maisotsenko cycle exchanger used to recover heat in the air-conditioning system is compared with Maisotsenko exchanger that operates only on the ambient airflow and does not allow to recover heat from the exhaust airflow from a conditioned space. Achieved results showed that M-Cycle below dew-point air cooler can operate more effectively in humid climates than traditional cross-flow Maisotsenko cycle exchanger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available