4.7 Article

Reinforcement Learning Based Capacity Management in Multi-Layer Satellite Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 4685-4699

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2020.2986114

Keywords

Satellites; Satellite broadcasting; Low earth orbit satellites; Resource management; Complexity theory; Heuristic algorithms; Network topology; Capacity management; reinforcement learning; multi-layer networks; satellite networks

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61922050, 91638205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of satellite networks is drawing much more attention in recent years due to the wide coverage ability. Composed of geosynchronous orbit (GEO), medium earth orbit (MEO), and low earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the satellite network is a three-layer heterogeneous network of high complexity, for which comprehensive theoretical analysis is still missing. In this paper, we investigate the problem of capacity management in the three-layer heterogeneous satellite network. We first construct the model of the network and propose a low-complexity method for calculating the capacity between satellites. Based on the time structure of the time expanded graph, the searching space is greatly reduced compared to traditional augmenting path searching strategies, which can significantly reduce the computing complexity. Then, based on Q-learning, we proposed a long-term optimal capacity allocation algorithm to optimize the long-term utility of the system. In order to reduce the storage and computing complexity, a learning framework with low-complexity is constructed while taking the properties of satellite systems into account. Finally, we analyze the capacity performance of the three-layer heterogeneous satellite network and also evaluate the proposed algorithms with numerical results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available