4.7 Article

Good Feature Matching: Toward Accurate, Robust VO/VSLAM With Low Latency

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 657-675

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2020.2964138

Keywords

Feature extraction; Measurement; Robustness; Cameras; Robots; Optimization; Covariance matrices; Active matching; feature selection; visual odometry (VO); visual simultaneous localization and mapping (VSLAM)

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1816138]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1816138] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of state-of-the-art visual odometry/visual simultaneous localization and mapping (VSLAM) system exposes a gap in balancing performance (accuracy and robustness) and efficiency (latency). Feature-based systems exhibit good performance, yet have higher latency due to explicit data association; direct and semidirect systems have lower latency, but are inapplicable in some target scenarios or exhibit lower accuracy than feature-based ones. This article aims to fill the performance-efficiency gap with an enhancement applied to feature-based VSLAM. We present good feature matching, an active map-to-frame feature matching method. Feature matching effort is tied to submatrix selection, which has combinatorial time complexity and requires choosing a scoring metric. Via simulation, the Max-logDet matrix revealing metric is shown to perform best. For real-time applicability, the combination of deterministic selection and randomized acceleration is studied. The proposed algorithm is integrated into monocular and stereo feature-based VSLAM systems. Extensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks and compute hardware quantify the latency reduction and the accuracy and robustness preservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available