4.3 Article

Platelet Count and Mean Platelet Volume at the Time of and After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal

CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1052-1059

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616683804

Keywords

platelet activation; vascular physiology; atherothrombosis; acute coronary syndrome

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [11CRP7300003]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1P20 GM103492]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platelet count has been shown to be lower and mean platelet volume (MPV) to be higher in acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is not known whether these changes persist post-MI or if these measures are able to distinguish between acute thrombotic and non-thrombotic MI. Platelet count and MPV were measured in 80 subjects with acute MI (thrombotic and non-thrombotic) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at cardiac catheterization (acute phase) and at >3-month follow-up (quiescent phase). Subjects were stratified using stringent clinical, biochemical, histological, and angiographic criteria. Outcome measures were compared between groups by analysis of variance. Forty-seven subjects met criteria for acute MI with clearly defined thrombotic (n = 22) and non-thrombotic (n = 12) subsets. Fourteen subjects met criteria for stable CAD. No significant difference was observed in platelet count between subjects with acute MI and stable CAD at the acute or quiescent phase. MPV was higher in acute MI (9.18 +/- 1.21) compared to stable CAD (8.13 +/- 0.66; P = 0.003) at the acute phase but not at the quiescent phase (8.48 +/- 0.58 vs 8.94 +/- 1.42; P = 0.19). No difference in platelet count or MPV was detected between thrombotic and non-thrombotic subsets at acute or quiescent phases. The power to detect differences in these measures between thrombotic and non-thrombotic subsets was 58%. Higher MPV at the time of acute MI is not observed by 3 months post-MI (quiescent phase). Platelet count and MPV do not differ in subjects with thrombotic versus non-thrombotic MI. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate the utility of these measures in the diagnosis of acute MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available