4.6 Article

Risk and Resilience Assessment With Component Criticality Ranking of Electric Power Systems Subject to Earthquakes

Journal

IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 2837-2848

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2961356

Keywords

Resilience; Power systems; Earthquakes; Hazards; Generators; Loss measurement; Seismic measurements; Criticality ranking; earthquake response; economic impacts; importance measures; reliability; resilience; seismic risk assessment

Funding

  1. CONICYT, Chile
  2. RCUK/EPSRC, U.K. [EP/N034899/1]
  3. Fondecyt [1170836, 1141082, 1181136]
  4. Fondap [15110017]
  5. U.K. EPSRC RESNET [EP/I035781/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/N034899/1, EP/R030294/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Countries around the world suffer the dramatic impact of earthquakes and other natural hazards reflected in casualties, infrastructure damage, service interruptions, and recovery costs. Although disaster exposure consciousness of electric power systems has increased in recent years, mitigation and adaptation actions, such as reserve scheduling and infrastructure investments, are usually performed without quantitative tools to account for the underlying stochasticity of these events. This article first discusses why an integrated assessment, which incorporates sources of uncertainty (risk) and manages the time-dependency of the recovery process (resilience), should be used to assess the impact of seismic events on electric power systems. Thereafter, a probabilistic methodology that considers the hazard, vulnerability, operation, and recovery of the system is presented. As a case study, the probabilistic seismic resilience of the electric power system of Northern Chile is assessed using different risk measures, including expected annual loss, value at risk, and conditional value-at-risk. Finally, a novel criticality assessment based on these metrics is developed to demonstrate that, for certain networks such as the study case, retrofit of selective components can notably improve the resilience of the complete system to seismic events. For example, if one specific component from the 152 components of the study system is assumed invulnerable, expected annual interruption costs decrease by 8%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available