4.7 Article

Classification of Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Using Smartphone Mechanocardiography: A Multilabel Learning Approach

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages 7957-7968

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2981334

Keywords

Heart; Feature extraction; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Electrocardiography; Hospitals; Hafnium; Acute decompensated heart failure; atrial fibrillation; gyrocardiography; machine learning; seismocardiography; smartphone mechanocardiography

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [290930]
  2. Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion [6756]
  3. Nokia Foundation [202010415]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [290930, 290930] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Timely diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) and heart failure (HF) are two prevalent cardiac disorders that are associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality, especially if they are concurrently present. Current approaches fail to screen many at-risk individuals who would benefit from preventive treatment; while others receive unnecessary interventions. An effective approach to the detection of CVDs is mechanocardiography (MCG) by which translational and rotational precordial chest movements are monitored. In this study, we collected MCG data from a study sample of 300 hospitalized cardiac patients using multidimensional built-in inertial sensors of a smartphone. Our main objective was to detect concurrent AFib and acute decompensated HF (ADHF) using smartphone MCG (or sMCG). To this end, we adopted a supervised machine learning classification using multi-label and hierarchical classification. Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting were used as candidate classifiers. The results of the analysis showed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.98 and 0.85 for AFib and ADHF, respectively. The highest percentages of positive and negative predictive values for AFib were 91.9 and 100; while for ADHF, they were 56.9 and 88.4 for the multi-label classification and 69.9 and 68.8 for the hierarchical classification, respectively. We conclude that using a single sMCG measurement, AFib can be detected accurately whereas ADHF can be detected with moderate certainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available