4.7 Article

Whole-exome sequencing identifies compound heterozygous mutations in ARSA of two siblings presented with atypical onset of metachromatic leukodystrophy from a Chinese pedigree

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 460, Issue -, Pages 135-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.038

Keywords

Metachromatic leukodystrophy; Arylsulfatase A; Mutation analysis; Whole-exome sequencing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare inherited lysosomal storage disorder caused mainly by variants in arylsulfatase A (ARSA) gene. MLD can be divided into three major clinical forms according to the age of onset: late infantile, juvenile, and adult. We report two siblings of late infantile MLD presenting with cerebellar ataxia as the only first clinical symptom. Methods: Because of the unspecific neurological manifestation, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to find disease-causing mutations for molecular diagnosis. Then successive MRI and ARSA activity determination were performed to further confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, the prenatal diagnosis was carried out on the basis of molecular diagnosis. Results: The siblings exhibited compound heterozygous variants {[c.302G > T] + [c1344dupC]} in the ARSA gene, and both of the variants have been reported as disease-causing mutations previously. The results of MRI and low ARSA activity confirmed the diagnosis of MLD. Prenatal diagnosis showed that the fetus was a heterozygous carrier. Conclusions: It is recommended that WES be considered as a first line diagnostic procedure to discover potential disease-causing genetic variants in affected individuals with hereditary traits but without definite clinical diagnosis. However, the final diagnosis should be confirmed by comprehensive evaluations including biochemical, enzymatic or imaging investigations. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available