4.5 Article

The Influence of Visual-Manual Distractions on Anticipatory Driving

Journal

HUMAN FACTORS
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 401-417

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0018720820938893

Keywords

driver distraction; anticipation; driving simulators; driver behavior; experience

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the influence of distraction on anticipatory driving. The results indicate that experienced drivers engage in more anticipatory actions and exhibit more efficient visual scanning behaviors. However, participants with a secondary task displayed reduced anticipatory actions and less attention towards anticipatory cues. Furthermore, experienced drivers were less likely to have long glances towards the secondary task compared to novice drivers. The findings provide additional evidence supporting the role of driving experience and distraction engagement in anticipatory driving.
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate how anticipatory driving is influenced by distraction. Background: The anticipation of future events in traffic can allow potential gains in recognition and response times. Anticipatory actions (i.e., control actions in preparation for potential traffic changes) have been found to be more prevalent among experienced drivers in simulator studies when driving was the sole task. Despite the prevalence of visual-manual distractions and their negative effects on road safety, their influence on anticipatory driving has not yet been investigated beyond hazard anticipation. Methods: A simulator experiment was conducted with 16 experienced and 16 novice drivers. Half of the participants were provided with a self-paced visual-manual secondary task presented on a dashboard display. Results: More anticipatory actions were observed among experienced drivers; experienced drivers also exhibited more efficient visual scanning behaviors as indicated by higher glance rates toward and percent times looking at cues that facilitate the anticipation of upcoming events. Regardless of experience, those with the secondary task displayed reduced anticipatory actions and paid less attention toward anticipatory cues. However, experienced drivers had lower odds of exhibiting long glances toward the secondary task compared to novices. Further, the inclusion of glance duration on anticipatory cues increased the accuracy of a model predicting anticipatory actions based on on-road glance durations. Conclusion: The results provide additional evidence to existing literature supporting the role of driving experience and distraction engagement in anticipatory driving. Application: These findings can guide the design of in-vehicle systems and guide training programs to support anticipatory driving.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available