4.4 Article

Non-invasive high-speed blinking kinematics characterization

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04782-w

Keywords

Spontaneous blinking; Voluntary blinking; Kinematics; Non-invasive; Blink characterization

Categories

Funding

  1. Formacion de Profesorado Universitario Scholarship [FPU17/03665]
  2. Spanish Government through the MINECO research project [DPI2017-89867-C2-2-R]
  3. Conselleria d'Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana [GV/2018/059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The objective of this study was to analyze the differences in blinking kinematics of spontaneous and voluntary blinks using for the first time a self-developed, non-invasive, and image processing-based method. Methods The blinks of 30 subjects were recorded for 1 min with the support of an eye-tracking device based on a high-speed infrared video camera, working at 250 frames per second, under two different experimental conditions. For the first condition, subjects were ordered to look in the straightforward position at a fixation target placed 1 m in front of them, with no further instructions. For the second, subjects were additionally asked to blink only following a sound signal every 6 s. Results Mean complete blinks increased by a factor of 1.7 from the spontaneous to the voluntary condition while mean incomplete blinks reduced significantly by a factor of 0.4. In both conditions, closing mean and peak velocities were always significantly greater and durations significantly lower than opening ones. When comparing the values for each condition, velocities and amplitudes for the voluntary condition were always greater than the corresponding values for spontaneous. Conclusion Voluntary blinks revealed significant kinematic differences compared to spontaneous, thus supporting a different supranuclear pathway organization. This study presents a new method, based on image analysis, for the non-invasive kinematic characterization of blinking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available