4.7 Article

Effect of Dust Load on the Cloud Top Ice-Water Partitioning Over Northern Middle to High Latitudes With CALIPSO Products

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 47, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL088030

Keywords

cloud phase; dust; ice fraction; CALIPSO

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16H02942, JP16H04046, JP17H06139]
  2. JAXA EarthCARE project
  3. RIAM, Kyushu University [2019A025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We quantified effects of dust load on the cloud top ice cloud fraction (ICF) in terms of the dust extinction coefficient (sigma(ext)). We analyzed 3-year data sets obtained from an active satellite sensor over middle to high latitudes in the northern hemisphere for temperatures (T) between 230 and 273 K and sigma(ext) values between 0.005 and 0.145 km(-1). At about 250 K, ICF changed by about 30% in response to the above range of sigma(ext), whereas at extreme T values, ICF was relatively insensitive to sigma(ext). Thus, we concluded that ICF was primarily determined by T, with substantial influence of sigma(ext) at about 250 K, likely due to increased opportunities for freezing as sigma(ext) increases. Sensitivity of ICF was the lowest both at the largest sigma(ext) and lowest T and at the smallest sigma(ext) and highest T, while it was the highest at about 0.03 km(-1) of sigma(ext) and about 250 K. If there are any physical parameters that influence the ICF except temperature (T), how much does this parameter influence ICF in a given T? Dust particles have been long known as efficient ice nucleating particles. Although previous studies suggested that more dust particles increased ICF, they did not use quantitative parameters of the dust amount, but less-quantitative indicators such as relative dust frequency. Therefore, we used the dust extinction coefficient (sigma(ext)) as a quantitative parameter of dust amount and examined the relationship between the dust amount and ICF for T between 230 and 273 K. We observed the following phenomena from satellite data. At about 250 K, ICF substantially depended on sigma(ext) likely due to increased opportunities for freezing as sigma(ext) increases. However, at extreme T values, ICF was relatively insensitive to sigma(ext). Moreover, we found that sensitivity of ICF was the lowest both at the largest sigma(ext) and lowest T and at the smallest sigma(ext) and highest T, while it was the highest at about 0.03 km(-1) of sigma(ext) and about 250 K. These behaviors of the ICF sensitivity could be understood from characteristics of T (the lower, the easier for freezing) and sigma(ext) (the larger, the easier for freezing).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available