4.7 Article

A long-read RNA-seq approach to identify novel transcripts of very large genes

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 885-897

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.259903.119

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, District of Columbia Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Award (DC-IDDRC) program [1U54HD090257]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01NS029525, T32AR056993]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [ZIANS003129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA-seq is widely used for studying gene expression, but commonly used sequencing platforms produce short reads that only span up to two exon junctions per read. This makes it difficult to accurately determine the composition and phasing of exons within transcripts. Although long-read sequencing improves this issue, it is not amenable to precise quantitation, which limits its utility for differential expression studies. We used long-read isoform sequencing combined with a novel analysis approach to compare alternative splicing of large, repetitive structural genes in muscles. Analysis of muscle structural genes that produce medium (Nrap: 5 kb), large (Neb: 22 kb), and very large (Ttn: 106 kb) transcripts in cardiac muscle, and fast and slow skeletal muscles identified unannotated exons for each of these ubiquitous muscle genes. This also identified differential exon usage and phasing for these genes between the different muscle types. By mapping the in-phase transcript structures to known annotations, we also identified and quantified previously unannotated transcripts. Results were confirmed by endpoint PCR and Sanger sequencing, which revealed muscle-type-specific differential expression of these novel transcripts. The improved transcript identification and quantification shown by our approach removes previous impediments to studies aimed at quantitative differential expression of ultralong transcripts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available