4.6 Article

NoDe: a fast error-correction algorithm for pyrosequencing amplicon reads

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0520-5

Keywords

Error correction; Denoising; 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing; 454 pyrosequencing; Metagenomics

Funding

  1. SCK-CEN PhD Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The popularity of new sequencing technologies has led to an explosion of possible applications, including new approaches in biodiversity studies. However each of these sequencing technologies suffers from sequencing errors originating from different factors. For 16S rRNA metagenomics studies, the 454 pyrosequencing technology is one of the most frequently used platforms, but sequencing errors still lead to important data analysis issues (e.g. in clustering in taxonomic units and biodiversity estimation). Moreover, retaining a higher portion of the sequencing data by preserving as much of the read length as possible while maintaining the error rate within an acceptable range, will have important consequences at the level of taxonomic precision. Results: The new error correction algorithm proposed in this work - NoDe (Noise Detector) - is trained to identify those positions in 454 sequencing reads that are likely to have an error, and subsequently clusters those error-prone reads with correct reads resulting in error-free representative read. A benchmarking study with other denoising algorithms shows that NoDe can detect up to 75% more errors in a large scale mock community dataset, and this with a low computational cost compared to the second best algorithm considered in this study. The positive effect of NoDe in 16S rRNA studies was confirmed by the beneficial effect on the precision of the clustering of pyrosequencing reads in operational taxonomic units. Conclusions: NoDe was shown to be a computational efficient denoising algorithm for pyrosequencing reads, producing the lowest error rates in an extensive benchmarking study with other denoising algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available