4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Particle emissions from a HD SI gas engine fueled with LPG and CNG

Journal

FUEL
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117439

Keywords

SI gas engine; LPG; CNG; Soot structure; PN and PSDF; WHTC driving cycle

Funding

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CM1404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An extensive experimental campaign was addressed to study the emissive behavior of a heavy-duty (HD) spark ignition (SI) gas engine fueled with LPG and CNG, mainly focusing on particle emissions analysis. The engine was tested in transient condition, along the World Harmonized Transient Cycle (WHTC), also analyzing the engine response in correspondence of cold- and hot-start WHTCs. Overall, for both CNG and LPG, regulated emissions are within the Euro VI homologation limits. The average particle size distribution function indicates that particles with diameters below 23 nm contribute to about 20% of total PN for both the fuels. The results reveal that the particles are emitted in the first part of tests, highlighting a correlation of soot and PN emissions with some specific phases of the test cycle, namely in correspondence to the passage from long engine idle periods to speed/load increments, in both cold- and hot-start WHTCs. No significant variation in the distribution of primary particles dimension is discernible in the particles sampled along the different WHTC versions, indicating that cold- and hot-start WHTCs negligible affect the formation of the nuclei cores at the early stage of the particles formation. The thermal reactivity of both LPG and CNG-derived soot is in line with typical engine particulate matter: the soot is completely burnt in the temperatures range between 550 and 680 degrees C and a moderately higher reactivity in case of soot from cold-start CNG tests was detected. Such difference was related to the larger presence of oxygen functional groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available