4.7 Article

Hydrate Management in Deadlegs: Hydrate Deposition in Pipes with Complex Geometry

Journal

FUEL
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117440

Keywords

Gas hydrates; Flow assurance; Deposition; Deadlegs; Pipe geometry

Funding

  1. Equinor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deadlegs are pipe sections with no through flow for maintenance services in oil/gas production and transportation systems. As deadlegs are filled with stagnant fluids, the pipe wall is typically colder than the main flowlines. Water vapor can condense on the wall and form hydrates. The resulting hydrate deposits in the deadleg can pose significant operational risks. Hydrate deposition in gas environment has been studied for many different parameters. However, hydrate deposition in pipes with complex geometry, which is common in oil/gas pipeline networks, has not been considered yet. In this study, we investigate hydrate deposition in the 180 degrees straight pipe and the 90 degrees bent pipe with varying fill angles. While a natural convection in the 180 degrees straight pipe results can be considerable, it becomes less significant in the horizontal piece of the 90 degrees bent pipe. When tilting this pipe in the negative angle, the temperature gradient along the pipe changed pronouncedly and condensed water droplets dripped down to the end of the pipe, leading to the accumulation of we hydrate deposits. In the filled 90 degrees bent pipe with positive angles, free water in deposits, which is not yet converted into hydrates, dripped back to the header through which warm water vapor was initially introduced to the cold pipe. The resulting hydrate deposits were dry and spread out along the pipe surface, similar to the 180 degrees straight pipe case. Our experimental results demonstrate that hydrate deposition in deadlegs can be largely affected by the pipe geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available