4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study of the effect of elevated pressure on laminar burning velocity of lean H2/CO/O2/diluents flames

Journal

FUEL
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117753

Keywords

Laminar burning velocity; Heat flux method; Elevated pressure; Syngas

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2019XZZX005-1-01]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laminar burning velocities (S-L) of H-2/CO/O-2/diluents (He or N-2) were reported at lean conditions (phi = 0.5-1.0), elevated pressures (1-11 bar) and a wide range of H-2 -CO volumetric ratios. A new high-pressure rig based on specially designed heat flux burner was applied to obtain planar, adiabatic and stretch-less flames used for laminar burning velocity measurements. Five popular syngas oxidation mechanisms were tested against the obtained S-L data and showed satisfactory agreement even at high pressures up to 11 bar. S-L decreases as pressure increases while the negative pressure dependence of mass burning rate is experimentally and numerically found for syngas with high diluent content in the oxidizer or high hydrogen content in the fuel, which indicated the negative dependence of the overall reaction order on adiabatic flame temperature. Sensitivity and rate of production analyses indicated that the sensitivity coefficients and HO2 mole fraction increase to the maximum at the pressure of the minimum overall reaction order and then decreases, which leads to larger uncertainty on predicting S-L at higher pressures. The flame front height represented by the peak OH* chemiluminescence location also shows a non-monotonic variation trend as pressure increases and can serve as a target for mechanism validation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available