4.7 Article

Coupling effect of porosity and hydrate saturation on the permeability of methane hydrate-bearing sediments

Journal

FUEL
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117425

Keywords

Gas hydrate; Permeability; Reduction model; Porosity; Porous media

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676196, 51976228, 51736009]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-JSC028, QYZDJ-SSW-JSC033, ZDBS-LY-SLH041]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0307306]
  4. Special Project for Marine Economy Development of Guangdong Province [GDME-2018D002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water effective permeability (k(w)) of the methane hydrate-bearing sediments is a key parameter in the investigation of natural gas exploitation, and it is closely related to hydrate saturation (S-H) and the initial porosity of sediments. In this work, the effect of S-H on the k(w) were systematically investigated in different initial porosities of fine quartz sands. The results show that the initial porosity of sediments has significant influence on the k(w) of the sediments with and without methane hydrates, and the hindrance of methane hydrates was more pronounced in the sediments with higher initial porosity. The stability and decomposition process of hydrates in this study could be clearly measured by the differential pressure of the sediments, and the stability of hydrates during the permeability measurement was more than 3 h, which was new record in permeability measurement. Finally, a new reduction empirical model on the basis of simple cubic model and oblique cubic model was integrated, and the effect of initial porosity of sediments on water relative permeability could be eliminated. This model could provide a more accurate prediction of the permeability of hydrate reservoirs with the porosity variation of the sediment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available