4.7 Article

Studying effects of solid structure evolution on gasification reactivity of coal chars by in-situ Raman spectroscopy

Journal

FUEL
Volume 270, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117603

Keywords

Coal gasification; In-situ Raman spectroscopy; Structure evolution; Gasification reactivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878093]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0602601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on characteristics of structure evolution during pyrolysis and subsequent char gasification of lignite and bituminous coal. Coal pyrolysis was conducted on induction-heating reactor. As pyrolysis temperature increased, the graphitization degree of char increased, and the amount of C-O and -CH in char decreased, resulting in poorer gasification reactivity of char. Char gasification was conducted by thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), high-temperature stage microscope (HTSM) and in-situ Raman system to investigate gasification reactivity, in-situ evolution of morphology structure and in-situ evolution of carbon structure, respectively. As gasification proceeded, the projected area of char particle decreased rapidly first and then kept consistent, and degree of graphitization of char gradually increased. In-situ Raman parameters indicated difference in increasing rate of graphitization between lignite char and bituminous char decreased with increasing temperature. Higher temperature deactivated the alkali metals, leading to attenuation of their inhibitory effect on graphitization. Gasification reactivity index R-0.9 was in positively correlated with in-situ ID1/IG value, and corresponding correlation coefficient (R-2) for TGA and HTSM were 0.8108 and 0.9829, respectively. The higher R-2 for HTSM was due to the weaker diffusion effect. In-situ Raman parameter was more suitable for predicting gasification reactivity of single particle char.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available