4.5 Article

Secondary Worsening Following DYT1 Dystonia Deep Brain Stimulation: A Multi-country Cohort

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00242

Keywords

DYT1; dystonia; deep brain stimulation; globus pallidus internus; pallidum

Funding

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. NIH [KL2 NS09295701A1, K23 NS09295701A1]
  3. Michael J. Fox Foundation
  4. Cala Health
  5. DOD Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  6. Medtronic corporation
  7. Boston scientific
  8. 2016 Research Prize of the European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
  9. Healers Foundation
  10. Medtronic
  11. St. Jude-Abbott
  12. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of special funding support [XMLX201833]
  13. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971070]
  14. Collaborative Center for X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism
  15. Benign Essential Blepharospasm Research Foundation
  16. Dystonia Coalition
  17. Dystonia Medical Research Foundation
  18. National Organization for Rare Disorders
  19. Functional Neuromodulation
  20. Neuropace
  21. NPF
  22. Parkinson Alliance
  23. Smallwood Foundation
  24. Bachmann-Strauss Foundation
  25. Tourette Syndrome Association
  26. UF Foundation
  27. PeerView
  28. Prime
  29. QuantiaMD
  30. WebMD
  31. Medicus
  32. MedNet
  33. Henry Stewart
  34. Vanderbilt University
  35. Donnellan/Einstein/Merz Chair
  36. [R01 NR014852]
  37. [R01NS096008]
  38. [NS087997]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To reveal clinical characteristics of suboptimal responses to deep brain stimulation (DBS) in a multi-country DYT1 dystonia cohort. Methods: In this multi-country multi-center retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of DYT1 patients who experienced suboptimal responses to DBS defined as Results: Approximately 8% of our study cohort (11 out of 132) experienced suboptimal responses to DBS. Compared with the historical cohort, the multi-country cohort with suboptimal responses had a significantly younger age at onset (mean, 7.0 vs. 8.4 years;p= 0.025) and younger age at DBS (mean, 12.0 vs. 18.6 years;p= 0.019). Additionally, cranial involvement was more common in the multi-country cohort (before DBS, 64% vs. 45%,p= 0.074; before or after DBS, 91% vs. 47%,p= 0.001). Mean motor improvement at the last follow-up from baseline were 0% and 66% for the multi-country and historical cohorts, respectively. All 11 patients of the multi-country cohort had generalization of dystonia within 2.5 years after disease onset. All patients experienced dystonia improvement of >30% postoperatively; however, secondary worsening of dystonia commenced between 6 months and 3 years following DBS. The improvement at the last follow-up was less than 30% despite optimally-placed leads, a trial of multiple programming settings, and additional DBS surgeries in all patients. The on-/off-stimulation comparison at the long-term follow-up demonstrated beneficial effects of DBS despite missing the threshold of 30% improvement over baseline. Conclusion: Approximately 8% of patients represent a more aggressive phenotype of DYT1 dystonia characterized by younger age at onset, faster disease progression, and cranial involvement, which seems to be associated with long-term suboptimal responses to DBS (e.g., secondary worsening). This information could be useful for both clinicians and patients in clinical decision making and patient counseling before and following DBS implantations. Patients with this phenotype may have different neuroplasticity, neurogenetics, or possibly distinct neurophysiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available