4.7 Article

Evaluating the bactericidal action of hypochlorous acid in culture media

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 119-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.033

Keywords

Hypochlorous acid; Reactive chlorine species; Oxidants; Bactericide

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [15/479]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bactericidal activity of the physiological oxidant hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is commonly studied in a variety of laboratory media. Reactive with numerous targets, HOCl will rapidly lose its toxicity via reduction or be converted to chloramines and other less toxic species. The objective of this study was to test the influence of various media, temperature and reaction time on the toxicity of HOCl. After incubating bacteria in media dosed with reagent HOCl, the bactericidal outcome was measured by colony forming ability. In parallel, we determined the HOCl and chloramine content after dosing media alone. Our results showed that more reagent HOCl was required to kill bacteria in culture media than in aqueous buffer, and this corresponded to the lower concentration of reactive chlorine species achieved in the media. RPMI and MOPS minimal medium retained significant oxidising equivalents after HOCl-dosing, but more nutrient-rich media such as MEM, DMEM, LB and TSB, had higher scavenging capacity. Other factors that lowered the bactericidal strength of HOCl were longer lag-times and raised temperature when pre-dosing media, and insufficient incubation time of cells with the HOCl-treated media. In summary, we demonstrate that the choice of media as well as procedural details within experiments crucially impact the cellular toxicity of HOCl. These factors influence the nature and concentration of oxidants generated, and therefore are critical in affecting cellular responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available