4.7 Article

Multivariate relationships among sensory attributes and volatile components in commercial dry porcini mushrooms (Boletus edulis)

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109112

Keywords

Dry porcini mushroom; Aroma characteristic; Hedonic rating; Volatile compound; Relative odor activity value; Multivariate analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972191]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFD0400705]
  3. School Level Cultivation Fund of Beijing Technology and Business University for Distinguished and Excellent Young Scholars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present research investigated the relationships among sensory attributes and volatile components in dry porcini mushrooms by multivariate statistical analyses. The sensory characteristics were based on quantitative descriptive analysis and consumer hedonic assessment. The volatile compounds were extracted by solid-phase microextraction, then were identified using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-olfactometry. The results showed that the high hedonic rating of porcini mushrooms was due in part to its aroma notes such as seasoning-like, roasted, cacao-like and smoky. High hedonic liking and positive aromas of porcini mushrooms could be responsible for the volatiles including 3-(methylthio)propanal, 3-(methylthio)propanol, pyrazines, phenolic and furanone components. On the other hand, raw mushroom-like, cardboard-like, as well as sweaty attributes were attributed to the relatively low hedonic liking of porcini mushrooms, which correlated with high contents of 1-octen-3-ol, octanal, 2-pentylfuran and 3-methylbutanoic acid. The information reported here could be important for the quality control of commercial porcini mushrooms by providing an approach to strengthen the interpretation of sensory data by showing how they were affected by the chemical properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available