4.7 Article

Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus fermentum suggests a free-living lifestyle of this lactic acid bacterial species

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103448

Keywords

Genomics; Comparative genomics; Sourdough; Lactobacillus fermentum; Carbohydrate metabolism

Funding

  1. Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (SRP7 project)
  2. Research Council of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (IOF342 project)
  3. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [1510809N]
  4. Research Foundation Flanders [1119916N, 1111918N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lactobacillus fermentum is a lactic acid bacterium frequently isolated from mammal tissues, milk, and plant material fermentations, such as sourdough. A comparative genomics analysis of 28 L. fermentum strains enabled the investigation of the core and accessory genes of this species. The core protein phylogenomic tree of the strains examined, consisting of five clades, did not exhibit clear clustering of strains based on isolation source, suggesting a free-living lifestyle. Based on the presence/absence of orthogroups, the largest Glade, containing most of the human-related strains, was separated from the rest. The extended core genome included genes necessary for the heterolactic fermentation. Many traits were found to be strain-dependent, for instance utilisation of xylose and arabinose. Compared to other strains, the genome of L. fermentum IMDO 130101, a candidate starter culture strain capable of dominating sourdough fermentations, contained unique genes related to the metabolism of starch degradation products, which could be advantageous for growth in sourdough matrices. This study explained the traits that were previously demonstrated for L. fermentum IMDO 130101 at the genetic level and provided future avenues of research regarding L. fermentum strains isolated from sourdough.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available