4.7 Article

Rapid analysis of food raw materials adulteration using laser direct infrared spectroscopy and imaging

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107114

Keywords

Food adulteration; Laser direct infrared imaging; Untargeted method; Raw materials; Vibrational spectroscopy; Mid-infrared

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess the application of the Laser Direct Infrared (LDIR) imaging system as a rapid screening technology for detection, identification, and semi-quantitation of adulterants in food ingredients. Forty-five samples of skimmed milk powder, thirty-one samples of soy protein isolate, thirty-five samples of chicken meat powder, thirty-two samples of pea protein isolate and six samples of wheat flour were dry blended adulterated with nitrogen-rich compounds and bulking agents at concentrations of 1.0-15.0% (w/w). In addition, ten samples of skimmed milk powder were wet blended with food adulterants at 5.0% and 10.0% (w/w) to check the LDIR performance when different fraudulent processes are applied. The results from this study shows that LDIR can be used as a rapid untargeted screening method that are independent of adulterants to detect, identify and semi-quantify food adulterants in dry blended samples. In most samples, the technology accurately identified all nitrogen-rich compounds and bulking agents present in the dry blended samples. In addition, the technology shows sensitivity of 82% for samples adulterated at 1% and sensitivity from 92% to 100% for samples adulterated at >= 5% economic adulteration. On the other hand, the detection and identification of food adulterants in samples prepared by wet blending process was more challenging than dry blended samples because mid-infrared technology may not be sensitive enough to detect adulterants if they are dissolved or if hidden within the particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available