4.7 Article

Quality preservation of sweet cherry cv. 'staccato' by using glycine-betaine or Ascophyllum nodosum

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126713

Keywords

Biostimulants; Salicylic acid; Glycine-betaine; Prunus avium L.; Fruit traits; Polyphenols; Antioxidant activity

Funding

  1. INTERACT project- Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chains and Technology [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through NORTE 2020 (North Regional Operational Program 2014/2020)
  3. Project IBERPHENOL [0377_IBERPHENOL_6_E]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through POCTEP 2014-2020
  5. National Funds by FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UIDB/04033/2020]
  6. [BPD/UTAD/INTERACT/ISAC/189/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pre-harvest application of exogenous compounds has been employed in many crops, as a cultural practice, to promote their adaptation to a new climate-changing environment. Effect of foliar pre-harvest application of salicylic acid, glycine-betaine complex and seaweed extract (Ascophyllum nodosum) on the cherry quality from `Staccato' cultivar was studied. Treatments significantly affected (p < 0.01) the fruit size, soluble solids content, pH, colour, polyphenols, vitamin C and antioxidant activity. Glycine-betaine and A. nodosum treated cherries presented higher dimensions, soluble solids content and pH and lower acidity. In addition, these cherries had a higher content of polyphenols and vitamin C and antioxidant capacity, but lower values of L*, C* ab and hue angle, meaning that both treatments can rise the fruit ripening process. Therefore, the pre-harvest application of glycine-betaine and A. nodosum can be a good alternative to promote the adaptation of sweet cherry tree to stressful environmental conditions, without compromising the fruit quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available