4.7 Review

Association between male infertility and male-specific malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based retrospective cohort studies

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 984-996

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.042

Keywords

Epidemiology; male factor infertility; prostate cancer; relative risk; testicular cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the current evidence that correlates impaired male fertility with the risk of developing male-related malignancies. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based retrospective cohort studies. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Men diagnosed with impaired fertility status and subsequently observed to determine incidence risk in developing testicular cancer (TCa) or prostate cancer (PCa). Intervention(s): Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pooled risk ratio (RR) differences among male factor infertility subjects compared with a fertile control population, and meta-regression analysis according to age at baseline, mean follow-up, range of study time, and year of publication. Result(s): Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically examined. Four studies examined male infertility and TCa (n = 161,634; 174 TCa cases), and four examined infertility in relation to PCa (n = 183,950 men; 377 PCa cases) from 1963 to 2014. The pooled RR was 2.033 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-2.48); heterogeneity: Q = 3.04 (degree of freedom [df] = 3); I-2 = 1.55% for TCa and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.17-2.4); Q = 23.3(df = 3); I-2 = 87.1% for PCa. Conclusion(s): Male infertility was associated with a subsequent risk of both TCa and PCa. Although the clinical significance of these findings remains uncertain, future studies should evaluate the underlying mechanisms to determine whether testis and prostate screening practices should be altered in men with male infertility. (C) 2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.yy

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available