4.7 Article

Male infertility and genitourinary birth defects: there is more than meets the eye

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 209-218

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.042

Keywords

Genitourinary birth defects; male infertility; copy number variants

Funding

  1. Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust
  2. Urology Care Foundation Research Scholars Award
  3. National Institute of Kidney and Digestive Diseases [1R01DK078121, 1U54HD10054901, 1R01HD095341, 5P01HD087157]
  4. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Male factor infertility is a significant problem present in up to 50% of infertile couples. The relationship between male infertility and systemic disease is of significant interest, and emerging evidence suggests a relationship between male infertility and male genitourinary (GU) birth defects (cryptorchidism, hypospadias, ambiguous genitalia, and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract). Many of these birth defects are treated in isolation by busy urologists without acknowledgment that these may be related to more global syndromic conditions. Conversely, geneticists and nonurologists who treat variable systemic phenotypes may overlook GU defects, which are indeed related conditions. Many of these defects are attributed to copy number variants dosage-sensitive genes due to chromosome microdeletions or microduplications. These variants are responsible for disease phenotypes seen in the general population. The copy number variants described in this review are syndromic in some cases and responsible for both GU birth defects as well as other systemic phenotypes. This review highlights the emerging evidence between these birth defects, male infertility, and other systemic conditions. ((C) 2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available