4.7 Review

The food-gut axis: lactic acid bacteria and their link to food, the gut microbiome and human health

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 454-489

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa015

Keywords

food microbiome; human microbiome; lactic acid bacteria; probiotics

Categories

Funding

  1. project MASTER (Microbiome Applications for Sustainable food systems through Technologies and Enterprise)
  2. European Union [818368]
  3. Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food, Forestry and Tourism Policies
  4. project JPI HDHL-INTIMIC-Knowledge Platform of Food, Diet, Intestinal Microbiomics and Human Health [790]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are present in foods, the environment and the animal gut, although fermented foods (FFs) are recognized as the primary niche of LAB activity. Several LAB strains have been studied for their health-promoting properties and are employed as probiotics. FFs are recognized for their potential beneficial effects, which we review in this article. They are also an important source of LAB, which are ingested daily upon FF consumption. In this review, we describe the diversity of LAB and their occurrence in food as well as the gut microbiome. We discuss the opportunities to study LAB diversity and functional properties by considering the availability of both genomic and metagenomic data in public repositories, as well as the different latest computational tools for data analysis. In addition, we discuss the role of LAB as potential probiotics by reporting the prevalence of key genomic features in public genomes and by surveying the outcomes of LAB use in clinical trials involving human subjects. Finally, we highlight the need for further studies aimed at improving our knowledge of the link between LAB-fermented foods and the human gut from the perspective of health promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available