4.3 Article

Contact Lens Discomfort Management: Outcomes of Common Interventions

Journal

EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 256-264

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000727

Keywords

Contact lens discomfort; Daily disposable contact lenses; Artificial tears; Combined clinical score; CLDEQ-8

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Valladolid predoctoral program Convocatoria 2015 de contratos predoctorales de la Universidad de Valladolid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that lid hygiene and daily disposable contact lenses can effectively reduce contact lens discomfort symptoms, especially for patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction. However, simultaneous use of artificial tears did not further improve contact lens discomfort.
Purpose: To assess the consecutive implementation of habitual contact lens discomfort (CLD) management strategies: lid hygiene, daily disposable CL (DDCL) fitting, and artificial tear (AT) supplementation. Methods: Contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD symptoms (CLDEQ-8 >= 12 points) were included in the study. Subjects with Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were instructed to perform lid hygiene. All participants were fitted with a DDCL (delefilcon A) and evaluated 1 month later. After, half of them were randomly assigned to use AT (Povidone-2%) at least three times/day, and all participants were evaluated 1 month later. Tests performed were: lower tear meniscus area (LTMA), bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia, noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), and corneal and conjunctival staining. Weighted combined clinical scores (CS) were created to analyze signs. Changes in symptoms (CLDEQ-8) and CS were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: Forty-two subjects (mean age: 23.2 +/- 4.9 years) completed the study. Two CS were created, CS 1 was composed of bulbar, limbal, and tarsal hyperemia and corneal staining, and CS 2 by NITBUT, LTMA, and conjunctival staining. CLDEQ-8 was reduced after lid hygiene (mean: -2.73 +/- 2.13; P=0.012) and DDCL use (mean: -10.1 +/- 3.54; P<0.01), but not after AT use (P=0.62). CS 1 did not change after any intervention. CS-2 was higher (P=0.04) in DGM subjects after lid hygiene, it decreased (P=0.04) after DDCL use. Conclusions: Lid hygiene is effective for reducing CLD symptoms in MGD patients. Refitting subjects with delefilcon A is an effective intervention for CLD to reduce symptoms and achieve a healthier ocular surface. Simultaneous administration of AT did not further improve CLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available