4.5 Review

Predictors of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability: current evidences and future perspectives

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 769-782

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1803277

Keywords

Tacrolimus; kidney transplantation; pharmacokinetics; pharmacogenetics; demographic factors; drug interactions

Funding

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS [F450919F, FC-37471]
  2. French community of Belgium (WBI program) through FSR action (UCLouvain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction In kidney transplantation, tacrolimus (TAC) is at the cornerstone of current immunosuppressive strategies. Though because of its narrow therapeutic index, it is critical to ensure that TAC levels are maintained within this sharp window through reactive adjustments. This would allow maximizing efficiency while limiting drug-associated toxicity. However, TAC high intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability makes it more laborious to accurately predict the appropriate dosage required for a given patient. Areas covered This review summarizes the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding drug interactions, demographic and pharmacogenetics factors as predictors of TAC PK. We provide a scoring index for each association to grade its relevance and we present practical recommendations, when possible for clinical practice. Expert opinion The management of TAC concentration in transplanted kidney patients is as critical as it is challenging. Recommendations based on rigorous scientific evidences are lacking as knowledge of potential predictors remains limited outside of DDIs. Awareness of these limitations should pave the way for studies looking at demographic and pharmacogenetic factors as well as gut microbiota composition in order to promote tailored treatment plans. Therapeutic approaches considering patients' clinical singularities may help allowing to maintain appropriate concentration of TAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available