4.5 Article

Global Warming Potential in an Intensive Vegetable Cropping System as Affected by Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Rate

Journal

CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 766-774

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201400785

Keywords

Fertilizer nitrogen; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Net economic benefit; Nitrous oxide emission

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201686]
  2. National Science Technology Program [2012BAD15B03]
  3. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF) [CX(14)2050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenhouse gas emissions from vegetable production systems contribute to climate change, but the impact of nitrogen (N) rates and crop rotation on global warming potential (GWP) is not well documented. A field experiment was conducted to estimate the sum of GWP (mGWP) and yield-scaled GWP in an intensive vegetable cropping system. The study included the traditional rotation of celery-tomato-lettuce (Rt) and the modified rotation of bur clover-tomato-lettuce (Rm), and each with four fertilizer N options (control, manure-N, optimum, and conventional N). The nitrous oxide emission rates were 6.87 and 10.24 kg N ha(-1), and the mGWP values were 27.9 and 31.8 MgCO2-eq ha(-1) per year from the optimum and conventional N plots under the traditional rotation, respectively. The change from the traditional to modified rotation reduced N input by 25%, N2O emissions by 24%, and mGWP by 14% but increased the net economic benefit by 33% under the optimized N application rate in the intensive vegetable cropping system. The trends of yield-scaled GWP from different N rates and vegetable crop rotations were similar to the mGWP. This study proved that optimizing vegetable crop rotation by including legumes and adjusting N application rates simultaneously can reduce global warming potential while maintaining agricultural economic benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available