4.6 Article

In vivo confocal microscopy: The role of comparative approach in patients with multiple atypical nevi

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 945-952

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14162

Keywords

dermoscopy; melanoma; morphologic; reflectance confocal microscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [NET-2011-02347213]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) increases diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis when combined with dermoscopy. In patients with multiple atypical nevi, a comparative dermoscopic approach improves melanoma recognition and saves unnecessary excision. The performance of a comparative approach combining dermoscopy and RCM has not been yet investigated. Objective To validate a comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach according to melanoma diagnostic accuracy in patients with multiple atypical nevi. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing RCM examination for >= 3 atypical melanocytic lesions, assessed with a dermoscopic + RCM comparative approach in a real-life setting, from July 2012 to April 2018 at a single centre, were enrolled. Dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM morphologic approaches were retrospectively applied by evaluating revisited 7-point checklist, RCM and Delphi scores for each enrolled lesion. Comparative dermoscopic and dermoscopic + RCM approaches were subsequently used. For each approach, lesions were classified as non-suspicious (long-term follow-up) or suspicious (short-term follow-up or excision) and diagnostic accuracy for melanoma diagnosis was assessed. Results Diagnostic accuracy progressively increased comparing morphologic to comparative approaches, and comparing dermoscopic to dermoscopic + RCM approaches. The retrospective comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach revealed the largest area under the curve (0.84; 95%CI:0.79-0.89;P < .001) and the lowest number needed to excise (5.7). Furthermore, this approach had the highest specificity (67.6%) and sensitivity (100%) levels, which were similar to those verified in the real-life setting. The main study limitations are the retrospective design and high-risk patient inclusion only. Conclusions Comparative dermoscopic + RCM approach increases melanoma diagnostic accuracy, reducing unnecessary excision without missing melanomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available