4.5 Article

Development of the Core Yellow Flags Index (CYFI) as a brief instrument for the assessment of key psychological factors in patients undergoing spine surgery

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1935-1952

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06462-z

Keywords

SPINE surgery; Outcome; Yellow flags; Registry data; Core Yellow Flags Index (CYFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Depression, anxiety, catastrophising, and fear-avoidance beliefs are key yellow flags (YFs) that predict a poor outcome in back patients. Most surgeons acknowledge the importance of YFs but have difficulty assessing them due to the complexity of the instruments used for their measurement and time constraints during consultations. We performed a secondary analysis of existing questionnaire data to develop a brief tool to enable the systematic evaluation of YFs and then tested it in clinical practice. Methods The following questionnaire datasets were available from a total of 932 secondary/tertiary care patients (61 +/- 16 years; 51% female): pain catastrophising (N = 347); ZUNG depression (N = 453); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale) (N = 308); fear-avoidance beliefs (N = 761). The single item that best represented the full-scale score was identified, to form the 4-item Core Yellow Flags Index (CYFI). 2422 patients (64 +/- 16 years; 54% female) completed CYFI and a Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) before lumbar spine surgery, and a COMI 3 and 12 months later (FU). Results The item-total correlation for each item with its full-length questionnaire was: 0.77 (catastrophising), 0.67 (depression), 0.69 (anxiety), 0.68 (fear-avoidance beliefs). Cronbach's alpha for the CYFI was 0.79. Structural equation modelling showed CYFI uniquely explained variance (p < 0.001) in COMI at both the 3- and 12-month FUs (beta = 0.11 (women), 0.24 (men); and beta = 0.13 (women),beta = 0.14 (men), respectively). Conclusion The 4-item CYFI proved to be a simple, practicable tool for routinely assessing key psychological attributes in spine surgery patients and made a relevant contribution in predicting postoperative outcome. CYFI's items were similar to those in the STarT Back screening tool used in primary care to triage patients into treatment pathways, further substantiating its validity. Wider use of CYFI may help improve the accuracy of predictive models derived using spine registry data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available