4.5 Article

Handgrip strength correlates with walking in lumbar spinal stenosis

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 2198-2204

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06525-1

Keywords

Handgrip strength; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Psoas muscle mass index; Sarcopenia; Walking speed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To examine the relationship between handgrip strength and leg extension power, walking speed, and intermittent claudication for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using computed tomography. Methods We examined patients who underwent laminectomy for LSS from June 2015 through March 2018. Before spine surgery, we evaluated walking distance, handgrip strength, leg extension power (LEP), 10-m walk test (time and steps), psoas muscle index (PMI), and the area of both total and multifidus muscle using plain computed tomography imaging at the third lumbar level. Handgrip strength was compared with comorbidities including anemia, diabetes, hypertension, marital status, etc. Results There were 183 patients (55 female, 128 male) with a mean age of 70.5 years. Handgrip strength significantly correlated with LEP (P < 0.001,r = 0.723), walking speed (P < 0.001,r = - 0.269), 10-m walking test (steps) (P < 0.001,r = - 0.352), area of skeletal muscle at L3 level (P < 0.001,r = 0.469), area of psoas muscle (P < 0.001,r = 0.380), PMI (P < 0.001,r = 0.253), and intermittent claudication. Age, height, and weight were correlated with handgrip strength, but BMI was not correlated. Handgrip strength was significantly reduced by anemia, hypertension, and single marital status. Conclusions The more handgrip strength patients with LSS have, the more LEP, the faster walking speed, the greater area of psoas and skeletal muscle, the fewer steps for a 10-m walk they have, and the longer walking distance. Age, height, and weight were associated with handgrip strength, but BMI has no association. Low handgrip strength was related to comorbidities including anemia, hypertension, and marital status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available