4.7 Article

Diffusion-weighted MR volume and apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating lymph node metastases and good response after chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 200-211

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07101-3

Keywords

Rectal neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Chemoradiotherapy; Lymph nodes

Funding

  1. Key Research Project of Sichuan Province [2019YFS0437]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI volume and ADC values in assessing LNM and good response after CRT in LARC patients. The results showed that DW-MRI Δ volume provided high diagnostic performance in discriminating LNM after CRT, and was equally accurate as post-CRT DW-MRI volume for evaluating good response.
Objective To determine diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) volume and apparent diffusion coefficient values (ADCs) for assessing lymph node metastases (LNM) and good response after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Materials and methods This retrospective study consisted of 61 patients with LARC who underwent pre- and post-CRT DW images. Two radiologists independently placed free-hand regions of interest in each tumor-containing section on DW images to calculate pre- and post-CRT tumor volume and tumor volume reduction rates (Delta volume). Regions of interest were drawn to include tumor on maximum cross-sectional slice to obtain ADCs. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance in identifying LNM and good response after CRT using these parameters. Results Inter-observer agreement and intra-observer agreement were excellent for pre- and post-CRT DW MR volume (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.889-0.948) and moderate for pre- and post-CRT ADCs (ICC, 0.535-0.811). AUCs for identifying LNM were 0.508 for pre-CRT DW MR volume versus 0.705 for pre-CRT ADC, 0.855 for post-CRT DW MR volume versus 0.679 for post-CRT ADC, and 0.887 for Delta volume versus 0.533 for Delta ADC. AUCs for identifying good response were 0.518 for pre-CRT volume versus 0.506 for pre-CRT ADC, 0.975 for post-CRT volume versus 0.723 for post-CRT ADC, and 0.987 for Delta volume versus 0.655 for Delta ADC. Conclusion DW MR Delta volume provided high diagnostic performance in discriminating LNM after CRT. DW MR Delta volume was equally as accurate as post-CRT DW MR volume for evaluating good response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available