4.2 Article

Evaluation of the altitude impact on a point-of-care thromboelastography analyzer measurement: prerequisites for use in airborne medical evacuation courses

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 489-495

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01420-2

Keywords

Thromboelastography; Altitude; Temperature; Sensitivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the performance of an easy-to-carry viscoelastic system in an aircraft environment and found that it exhibited good correlation with the reference method and another viscoelastic system. It also showed good usability and reliability in low atmospheric pressure conditions.
Purpose Hemorrhagic shock is the first cause of preventable death in combat. Evacuations of wounded by aircraft are increasingly used and severely injured patients can spend consequent time in the air, mostly during strategic evacuation. In these situations, monitoring of blood coagulation may be pivotal in the management of blood product transfusion. Viscoelastic-guided transfusion is relevant in these situations. However, evaluation of these devices used in aircraft is lacking, especially the impact of decreased atmospheric pressure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of an easy-to-carry viscoelastic system (TEG(R)6s, Haemonetics). Methods First, TEG(R)6s repeatability, reproducibility, and correlation with chronometric methods and TEG-5000 were assessed on quality controls, healthy volunteers, and patients. Secondly, we tested the influence of vibrations and altitude on TEG(R)6s parameters (0ft vs. 8000 ft = 2428 m) and on quality control samples (normal and hypocoagulable). Results TEG(R)6s exhibited good correlation with the reference method and TEG(R)5000. Repeatability and reproducibility CVs were satisfactory. The tests performed in the hypobaric chamber revealed that performance at 0 ft and 8000 ft (2428 m) for 9 out of 13 parameters was not significantly different. However, we showed a significant increasing of CRT.Alpha (p = 0.049), CK.Alpha, CK.MA (p < 0.001 andp < 0.01, respectively) and CFF.MA increased (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study provides proof of concept to validate testing in an actual aeromedical situation. Indeed, TEG(R)6s appears to ease of use, resistance to high altitude conditions, and reliability on healthy humans. It is necessary to carry out a study on hemorrhagic injured patients in an aircraft.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available