4.7 Article

A new combinatorial branch-and-bound algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 289, Issue 2, Pages 435-455

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.07.023

Keywords

Combinatorial optimization; Knapsack Problem with Conflicts; Maximum Weighted Clique Problem; Branch-and-bound algorithm

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the project COGDRIVE [DPI2017-86915-C3-3-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a novel combinatorial branch-and-bound algorithm for the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts, which effectively combines different procedures for pruning branch-and-bound nodes. The algorithm shows high pruning potential and low computational effort, outperforming state-of-the-art methods by up to two orders of magnitude in speed.
We study the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts, a generalization of the Knapsack Problem in which a set of conflicts specifies pairs of items which cannot be simultaneously selected. In this work, we propose a novel combinatorial branch-and-bound algorithm for this problem based on an n-ary branching scheme. Our algorithm effectively combines different procedures for pruning the branch-and-bound nodes based on different relaxations of the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts. Its main elements of novelty are: (i) the adoption of the branching-and-pruned set branching scheme which, while extensively used in the maximum-clique literature, was never successfully employed for solving the Knapsack Problem with Conflicts; (ii) the adoption of the Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem for the derivation of upper bounds used for pruning the branch-and-bound tree nodes; and (iii) the design of a new upper bound for the latter problem which can be computed very efficiently. Key to our algorithm is its high pruning potential and the low computational effort that it requires to process each branch-and-bound node. An extensive set of experiments carried out on the benchmark instances typically used in the literature shows that, for edge densities ranging from 0.1 to 0.9, our algorithm is faster by up to two orders of magnitude than the state-of-the-art method and by up to several orders of magnitude than a state-of-the-art mixed-integer linear programming solver. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available