4.7 Review

The informational value of employee online reviews

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 288, Issue 2, Pages 605-619

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.001

Keywords

Analytics; Employee online reviews; Topic modeling; Big data; Decision processes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the informational value of online reviews posted by employees, discovering that employee online reviews provide incremental predictive gains for decision support systems' information value and competitive advantage for firms and managers.
This paper investigates the informational value of online reviews posted by employees for their employer, a rather untapped source of online information from employees, using a sample of 349,550 reviews from 40,915 UK firms. We explore this novel form of electronic Word-of-Mouth (e-WOM) from different perspectives, namely: (i) its information content as a tool to identify the drivers of job satisfaction/dissatisfaction, (ii) its predictive ability on firm financial performance and (iii) its operational and managerial value. Our approach considers both the rating score as well as the review text through a probabilistic topic modeling method, providing also a roadmap to quantify and exploit employee big data analytics. The novelty of this study lies in the coupling of structured and unstructured data for deriving managerial insights through a battery of econometric, financial and operational research methodologies. Our empirical analyses reveal that employee online reviews have informational value and incremental predictability gains for a firm's internal and external stakeholders. The results indicate that when models integrate structured and unstructured big data there are leveraged opportunities for firms and managers to enhance the informativeness of decision support systems and in turn, gain competitive advantage. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available