4.5 Review

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 1561-1586

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-020-02346-6

Keywords

Mediterranean diet; Cancer; Meta-analysis; Certainty of evidence

Funding

  1. [010/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review updated the evidence on the association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and cancer mortality, site-specific cancer risk in the general population, all-cause mortality and cancer recurrence among cancer survivors. The analysis included 117 studies with 3,202,496 participants, showing an inverse association between highest adherence to MedDiet and various cancer risks, while moderate certainty of evidence was found for some outcomes.
Purpose The aim of current systematic review was to update the body of evidence on associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and risk of cancer mortality, site-specific cancer in the general population; all-cause, and cancer mortality as well as cancer reoccurrence among cancer survivors. Methods A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2020 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Study-specific risk estimates for the highest versus lowest adherence to the MedDiet category were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence from cohort studies and RCTs was evaluated using the NutriGrade scoring system. Results The updated search revealed 44 studies not identified in the previous review. Altogether, 117 studies including 3,202,496 participants were enclosed for meta-analysis. The highest adherence to MedDiet was inversely associated with cancer mortality (RRcohort: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.92;N = 18 studies), all-cause mortality among cancer survivors (RRcohort: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.86;N = 8), breast (RRobservational: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97;N = 23), colorectal (RRobservational: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90;N = 17), head and neck (RRobservational: 0.56, 95% CI 0.44, 0.72;N = 9), respiratory (RRcohort: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94;N = 5), gastric (RRobservational: 0.70, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80;N = 7), bladder (RRobservational: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76, 0.98;N = 4), and liver cancer (RRobservational: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54, 0.75;N = 4). Adhering to MedDiet did not modify risk of blood, esophageal, pancreatic and prostate cancer risk. Conclusion In conclusion, our results suggest that highest adherence to the MedDiet was related to lower risk of cancer mortality in the general population, and all-cause mortality among cancer survivors as well as colorectal, head and neck, respiratory, gastric, liver and bladder cancer risks. Moderate certainty of evidence from cohort studies suggest an inverse association for cancer mortality and colorectal cancer, but most of the comparisons were rated as low or very low certainty of evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available