4.5 Article

Temporal-plus epilepsy in children: A connectomic analysis in magnetoencephalography

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 61, Issue 8, Pages 1691-1700

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16591

Keywords

epilepsy; functional connectivity; neuroimaging; oscillations; phase-locking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Seizure recurrence following surgery for temporal lobe (TL) epilepsy may be related to extratemporal epileptogenic foci, so-called temporal-plus (TL+) epilepsy. Here, we sought to leverage whole brain connectomic profiling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) to identify neural networks indicative of TL+ epilepsy in children. Methods Clinical and MEG data were analyzed for 121 children with TL and TL+ epilepsy spanning 20 years at the Hospital for Sick Children. Resting-state connectomes were derived using the weighted phase lag index from neuromagnetic oscillations. Multidimensional associations between patient connectomes, TL versus TL+ epilepsy, seizure freedom, and clinical covariates were performed using a partial least squares (PLS) analysis. Bootstrap resampling statistics were performed to assess statistical significance. Results A single significant latent variable representing 66% of the variance in the data was identified with significant contributions from extent of epilepsy (TL vs TL+), duration of illness, and underlying etiology. This component was associated with significant bitemporal and frontotemporal connectivity in the theta, alpha, and beta bands. By extracting a brain score, representative of the observed connectivity profile, patients with TL epilepsy were dissociated from those with TL+, independent of their postoperative seizure outcome. Significance By analyzing 121 connectomes derived from MEG data using a PLS approach, we find that connectomic profiling could dissociate TL from TL+ epilepsy. These findings may inform patient selection for resective procedures and guide decisions surrounding invasive monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available