4.7 Article

Chemical fractionation and risk assessment of surface sediments in Luhun Reservoir, Luoyang city, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 28, Pages 35319-35329

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09512-7

Keywords

Luhun Reservoir; Sediment; Heavy metal; Chemical fraction; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41907267, 51979107]
  2. Henan Province University Scientific and Technological Innovation Team [18IRTSTHN009]
  3. Foundation for University Key Youth Teachers of Henan Province of China [2018GGJS077]
  4. Edanz Group China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the potential risks of heavy metals, including their bioavailability and toxicity, 15 surface sediment samples were collected from Luhun Reservoir in Luoyang city, China. Total concentrations and chemical fractions of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn were analyzed. Various rating methods were used to evaluate the degree, risk, and toxicity of the heavy metal pollution. Results showed that Cd and Pb were preferentially associated with exchangeable (55.77-69.76%) and reducible (53.54-69.43%) fractions, respectively, and therefore exhibited high potential availability. Cr (57.14-86.56%) and Ni (32.21-72.77%) occurred primarily in the residual fraction. Metal concentrations in the effective fraction of the sediment decreased in the order: Cd (96.32%) > Pb (91.61%) > Cu (64.54%) > Zn (57.23%) > Ni (41.51%) > Cr (21.68%). Risk assessment indicated that the risk for Cd is extremely high (62.96%); Cu, Pb, and Zn are ranked as medium risk. Based on the potential ecological risk index, these metals (especially Cd) showed higher potential risk near the dam region. Toxic unit values (2.89-6.05) in more than 60% of sediment sites exceeded a value of 4, and Pb had a relatively higher contribution (1.06-2.65). Cd and Pb are the main contaminants in sediments of Luhun Reservoir and should be paid more attention in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available