4.7 Article

Investigating social processes that underpin local flood risk management action

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 95-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.009

Keywords

Social processes; Flood risk management; Soft FRM; Wholescape thinking; Vision-making

Funding

  1. European Union [659449]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020005]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP130100498]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [659449] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As climate change erodes current levels of flood protection in the UK and government investment in 'hard' flood risk management (hFRM) is rationed by cost-benefit ratios, the option for many communities at-risk is to implement local 'soft' FRM (sFRM). The frequency of widespread flooding generates an added urgency to understand how to support sFRM. Using a case study and qualitative analysis, we explore social processes (SPs), such as acculturation, that drive stakeholder adaptation to be more flood resilient. We conceptualise the status quo beleaguered by conflict and competition and propose practices of accommodation and cooperation that can support shared objectives and responsibility that strengthen sFRM. Our conceptual model is mapped on a stylised catchment to illustrate how SPs underpin sFRM interventions that join-up the catchment in wholescape thinking. The transferable learning is that there are group behaviours and inclusive practices that can initiate and support local sFRM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available