4.4 Article

The use of artificial neural networks to estimate optimum insulation thickness, energy savings, and carbon dioxide emissions

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ep.13478

Keywords

artificial neural networks; energy; insulation; model; poultry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the applicability of artificial neural networks in modeling insulation optimization, annual savings, and carbon dioxide reduction in buildings. The Levenberg Marquardt model outperformed others, and the developed model was validated for different cities, providing guidance for thermal insulation worldwide.
This study examined artificial neural networks' (ANNs) applicability in modeling optimum insulation thickness (OIT), annual total net savings (ATS), and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions (RCO2) that result from insulating buildings. Data from insulation markets, economic parameters, fuel prices, and heating degree days (HDDs) were introduced into the model as input variables. To complete the most thorough analysis, three learning algorithms, Levenberg Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were employed. Five statistical indexes were utilized to evaluate models' performances: determination coefficient (R-2), root mean square error (RMSE), standard error of prediction (SEP), RMSE observations' standard deviation ratio (RSR), and average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE). Moreover, visualization techniques were used to assess the similarity between the OIT, ATS, and RCO(2)values calculated and predicted. The results obtained clearly show that the LM model outperformed the BR and SCG models in all estimations. Thereafter, the developed ANNs model was validated for different cities. Overall, this model will provide an effective and straightforward guide for people working in the field to improve thermal insulation design, analysis, and implementation worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available