4.7 Article

Outdoor-to-indoor transport of ultrafine particles: Measurement and model development of infiltration factor

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115402

Keywords

Particulate matter; Ambient air pollution; Indoor air quality; Human exposure

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0702700]
  2. Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ambient ultrafine particles (UFPs: particles of diameter less than 100 nm) cause significant adverse health effects. As people spend most time indoors, the outdoor-to-indoor transport of UFPs plays a critical role in the accuracy of personal exposure assessments. Herein, a strategy was proposed to measure and analyze the infiltration factor (F-inf) of UFPs, an important parameter quantifying the fraction of ambient air pollutants that travel inside and remain suspended indoors. Ninety-three measurements were conducted in 11 residential rooms in all seasons in Beijing, China, to investigate F-inf of UFPs and its associated influencing factors. A multilevel regression model incorporating eight possible factors that influence infiltration was developed to predict F-inf and F-infSOA (defined as the ratio of indoor to outdoor UFP concentrations without indoor sources, but with indoor secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation). It was found that the air change rate was the most important factor and coagulation was considerable, while the influence of SOA formation was much smaller than that of other factors. Our regression model accurately predicted daily-average F-inf. The annually-averaged F-inf of UFPs was 0.66 +/- 0.10, which is higher than that of PM2.5 and PM10, demonstrating the importance of controlling indoor UFPs of outdoor origin. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available