4.7 Article

Bioremediation of diesel and gasoline-contaminated soil by covermicomposting amended with activated sludge: Diesel and gasoline degradation and kinetics

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114584

Keywords

Diesel contaminated soil; Co-vermicomposting; E. fetida.; Gasoline; Biodegradation; Kinetics

Funding

  1. School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran [96-01-27-30000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Present study aims to examine the efficiency of co-vermicomposting amended with activated sludge and E. fetida earthworm for bioremediation of diesel and gasoline from contaminated soil. The diesel and gasoline removal efficiency and degradation rates coefficients were estimated with gas chromatography (GC) analysis and first-order kinetics. The removal of gasoline and diesel in different co-vermicomposting processes with and without E. fetida ranged between 65-100% and 24.94-63.93%, respectively within 90-day experiment. Removal of gasoline and diesel increased in soil with addition of earthworm (E. fetida); higher degradation rate coefficients (k) were observed for co-vermicomposting with earthworm compared with co-vermicomposting processes. The highest k (0.014) for diesel degradation was estimated for microcosm reactor 4 (R4), where high numbers of E. fetida accelerate the less biodegradable organic contaminant from the soil matrices. The reasonable survival rates of earthworms in exposure to high concentration of petroleum-derivatives contaminated soils indicated increased activity of ligninolytic dieseledegrading earthworms and microorganisms. Therefore, co-vermicomposting amended with activated sludge is suggested as feasible and promising technologies for bioremediation of high content of organic contaminants from the soil matrices. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available