4.6 Article

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in soils from Tianjin, North China: distribution, health risk, and temporal trends

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 1177-1191

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-020-00645-9

Keywords

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs); Soils; Distribution; Health risks; Temporal trends

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877467, 41571445]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1900104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted in Tianjin, China, revealed that PBDE concentrations in urban soils have decreased in recent years, primarily originating from local industrial production processes and consumer products. More research is needed to further investigate the changing trend of PBDE pollution and its potential impact on human health.
Available information is still insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of the global distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the environment. In particular, little is known about the changing trend of their distribution in urban soils. We conducted a survey of 21 PBDEs in urban soils from Tianjin, China. The chemicals were widely present in the area and summed concentrations ranged from 0.65 to 108 ng/g in soil, indicating low to moderate levels of pollution relative to other areas. BDE-209 was the predominant congener, contributing 88.9% of the concentrations of total soil PBDEs. Source assessment indicated that soil PBDEs in the area were mainly derived from the release of commercial deca-BDE from local industrial production processes and consumer products. We found that the soil concentrations of PBDEs appear to have declined in recent years, compared with other previous reports in this region. However, more studies are needed on this possible change trend of PBDE pollution, especially its impact on human health, although their calculated non-carcinogenic health risks in this study were low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available