4.7 Article

Evaluation criterion of different flow field patterns in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112841

Keywords

PEMFC; Flow field; Mass transfer; Pressure drop; Efficiency evaluation criterion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776144]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China
  3. Shanghai Automotive Industry Science and Technology Development Foundation [1817]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow field plays an important role in the design and application of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). The superiority of flow field is commonly evaluated by comparing the performance improvement of PEMFC. However, it's necessary to decrease the flow resistance to reduce the parasitic power and to obtain more uniform water and gas distributions during operation. As a consequence, the combined effect of performance and resistance should be considered during the optimal design of flow channel in PEMFC. A new criterion of efficiency evaluation criterion (EEC) using Sherwood number and Euler number has been proposed to evaluate the relationship between the mass transfer and the pressure drop in this study. The performances of PEMFCs with parallel, single-serpentine, and pressured parallel flow fields are investigated in detail. The results show that PEMFC with single-serpentine flow field has a better performance under normal atmospheric pressure, while the pressure drop in cathode is much larger than that in the parallel flow field. The pressured parallel flow field presents better performance and uniform gas distribution and it is thus proposed as the flow channel in the application of PEMFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available