4.7 Article

Orthogonally adapted Harris hawks optimization for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117804

Keywords

Parameters estimation; Photovoltaic models; Harris hawks optimization; Orthogonal learning; General opposition-based learning

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB1400400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1809209, 71803136]
  3. Key R&D Program Projects in Zhejiang Province [2019C01041]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2018A030313339]
  5. Scientific Research Team Project of Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology [SZIIT2019KJ022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracting parameters and constructing high-precision models of photovoltaic modules through actual current-voltage data is required for simulation, control, and optimization of a photovoltaic system. Because of the application of such problems, the identification of unknown parameters accurately and reliably remains a challenging task. In this paper, we propose an enhanced Harris Hawks Optimization (EHHO), which combines orthogonal learning (OL) and general opposition-based learning (GOBL), to estimate the parameters of solar cells and photovoltaic modules effectively and accurately. In EHHO, OL helps to improve the speed of the HHO method and the accuracy of the solution. At the same time, the GOBL mechanism can increase both diversity of the population and the HHO's exploitation performance. In addition, these two mechanisms defend the equilibrium between the exploitation and exploration rates. The results show that accuracy, reliability, and other aspects of this method are better than most existing methods. Thus, we observed that EHHO can be used as an effective method for parameter estimation of solar cells and photovoltaic modules. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available