4.4 Article

Seismic resilience of retrofitted RC buildings

Journal

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 561-571

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-020-0580-z

Keywords

resilience; reinforced-concrete; performance-based; seismic retrofit; non-ductile

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong under the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (HKPFS) of 2018
  2. Chinese National Engineering Research Centre (CNERC) for Steel Construction (Hong Kong Branch) at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University [P0013864, BBV9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing buildings can be at a greater seismic risk due to non-conformance to current design codes and may require structural retrofitting to improve building performance. The performance of buildings is measured in terms of immediate consequences due to direct damage, but the continuing impacts related to recovery are not considered in seismic retrofit assessment. This paper introduces a framework of retrofit selection based on the seismic resilience of deficient buildings retrofitted with the conventional mitigation approaches. The assembly-based methodology is considered for the seismic resilience assessment by compiling a nonlinear numerical model and a building performance model. The collapse fragility is developed from the capacity curve, and the resulting social, economic, and environmental consequences are determined. The seismic resilience of a building is assessed by developing a downtime assessment methodology incorporating sequence of repairs, impeding factors, and utility availability. Five functionality states are developed for the building functionality given investigated time interval, and a functionality curve for each retrofit is determined. It is concluded that seismic resilience can be used as a performance indicator to assess the continuing impacts of a hazard for the retrofit selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available