A synthesis and appraisal of clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and Cochrane systematic reviews for the management of focal spasticity in adults and children

Objective:To identify and appraise the existing clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and Cochrane systematic reviews for the management of adult and paediatric focal spasticity to generate a single synthesized guideline. Methods:Systematic review of 12 electronic databases. Clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements and Cochrane systematic reviews for focal spasticity in adults and children. Included studies were appraised according to the AGREE II criteria. Results:A total of 25 papers were included in this review, comprising 12 clinical practice guidelines, nine consensus statements and four Cochrane systematic reviews. The areas most strongly endorsed were: (1) management to be provided by a multi-disciplinary team, (2) therapy should be goal-directed, (3) goals to be developed in conjunction with the patient and family, and (4) importance of follow-up evaluations. There was a greater focus on activity outcomes and classification in the paediatric papers. The guidelines varied considerably in their quality, with AGREE II scores ranging from 52.8 to 97.1%. Conclusions:This systematic review has synthesized the key elements regarding principles of focal spasticity management, outcome measures, physical interventions and educational recommendations into a single, readily applied guideline available for clinical use. Despite considerable variability in the quality of the guidelines, several strong themes emerged.

Automated summary

This study aimed to generate a synthesized guideline for the management of adult and paediatric focal spasticity by identifying and appraising existing clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, and Cochrane systematic reviews. The review included 25 papers, consisting of clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, and Cochrane systematic reviews. The findings highlighted the importance of a multidisciplinary team, goal-directed therapy, involvement of patients and families in goal development, and the need for follow-up evaluations. The quality of the guidelines varied, but several strong themes emerged.