4.5 Review

Artificial intelligence for non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms

Journal

DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 285-289

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/den.13807

Keywords

artificial intelligence; CADe; colonoscopy; detection; non-polypoid neoplasia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite quality improvement programs and training, the miss rate of flat advanced colorectal neoplasia remains unacceptably high. There is still uncertainty about whether artificial intelligence can reduce the miss rate of flat neoplasia, as studies have limited flat colorectal lesions in their training sets.
The miss rate of flat advanced colorectal neoplasia is still unacceptably high, especially in the Western setting, notwithstanding the widespread implementation of quality improvement programs and training. It is well known that flat morphology is associated with miss rate of colorectal neoplasia, and that this subset of lesions often shows a more aggressive biological behaviour. Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to the detection of colorectal neoplasia has been shown to increase adenoma detection rate, consistently across all lesion sizes and locations in the colon. However, there is still uncertainty whether AI can reduce the miss rate of flat advanced neoplasia, mainly because all published trials report a low number of flat colorectal lesions in their training sets, and this could reduce AI accuracy for this subset of lesions. In addition, flat lesions have different morphologies with variable prevalence and potentially different accuracy in their detection. For example, the subtle appearance and rarer frequency of a non-granular laterally spreading tumor (LST) could be much harder to identify than a granular mixed LST. In this review, we present a summary of the evidence on the role of AI in the identification of colorectal flat neoplasia, with a focus on data regarding presence of LSTs in the training/validation sets of the AI systems currently available on the market.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available