4.7 Article

Assessing Cardiac Metabolism A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 118, Issue 10, Pages 1659-U485

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/RES.0000000000000097

Keywords

AHA Scientific Statements; metabolic pathways; metabolism, cardiac; molecular biology; radionuclide imaging; systems biology

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/8/30266] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/P011705/1, MC_UP_A090_1006] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL112413, R01 HL127764] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB015908] Funding Source: Medline
  5. British Heart Foundation [RG/13/8/30266] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/P011705/1, MC_UP_A090_1006] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10005] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/P011705/1, MC_UP_A090_1006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a complex system of interrelated reactions, the heart converts chemical energy to mechanical energy. Energy transfer is achieved through coordinated activation of enzymes, ion channels, and contractile elements, as well as structural and membrane proteins. The heart's needs for energy are difficult to overestimate. At a time when the cardiovascular research community is discovering a plethora of new molecular methods to assess cardiac metabolism, the methods remain scattered in the literature. The present statement on Assessing Cardiac Metabolism seeks to provide a collective and curated resource on methods and models used to investigate established and emerging aspects of cardiac metabolism. Some of those methods are refinements of classic biochemical tools, whereas most others are recent additions from the powerful tools of molecular biology. The aim of this statement is to be useful to many and to do justice to a dynamic field of great complexity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available